Contributed by Todd Crawford and David Sharpe, our latest blog post covers the recent Supreme Court decision in a choice-of-law dispute involving the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act.
Read moreA recent decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit supports contracting parties’ rights “to freely engage in sophisticated contractual arrangements” in the State of Louisiana.
Read moreOur latest blog profiles a recent Louisiana Supreme Court decision that Louisiana statutory law does not prohibit enforcement of a forum selection clause in a first-party insurance policy.
Read moreOur latest blog post discusses the importance of reviewing liability insurance policies to ensure full protection against lawsuits.
Read moreAn examination of bankruptcy preference issues, strategies for dealing with preference liability claims and an overview of statutory defenses.
Read moreOur latest blog post covers the recent Supreme Court decision of New Prime v. Oliveira, which addresses Section 1 of the Federal Arbitration Act and its effect on independent contractors.
Read moreGenerally, an insurance policy’s appraisal does not include a provision explicitly requiring that the one party be notified if and when the other party goes to court. In this blog post, our Insurance practice explores whether notice should be required.
Read moreFollowing a split decision between the Fifth and Ninth Circuits, our latest blog post explores the question posed to the U.S. Supreme Court of whether punitive damages are available for unseaworthiness.
Read moreOur newest blog post, contributed by Rebecca Moore from our Houston office, spotlights a recent Texas contractual and extra-contractual claims dispute.
Read moreOur latest blog post discusses the outcome of a recent case resulting from the failure to comply with an examination under oath.
Read moreThank you for contacting Lugenbuhl, Wheaton, Peck, Rankin & Hubbard. Before you click “Accept” below, please be aware that communication through email or our website does not establish a client-attorney relationship between you and our firm. Please do not send any confidential or privileged information through electronic communications. By clicking “Accept,” you provide us access to the included information and do not consider it confidential.
×